Interesting point that I have given some thought to in the past. Am I right in thinking that there aren't any logging ruby frameworks that integrate with syslog in linux systems. So that you can control the target (and level) of the logging messages via /etc/syslog.conf ?
On 04/05/11 13:48, Nicholas Faiz wrote: > I'd be interested in having a general purpose logging framework I > could use for various tasks. In some of the code I work on, there are > some logging statements which run to stdout (and which I might like to > do other things with), and others which are written to a db for an end > user to see when representing application activity. They are currently > two different areas of code (the former simply puts), but being able > to to specify logging handlers and logging levels/audiences etc., > would be great. > > Log4r never seemed to get a lot of adoption in the Ruby world? See > http://log4r.rubyforge.org/ . I guess because it uses YML or XML for > config and is too reminiscent of Log4J? > > It'd be nice to have a simple logging mechanism which could be > leveraged for different things (my e.g. first paragraph). Unsure of > why there isn't one really. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
