Ah, cool. Well I might spend a bit of time playing with CE and try to get it running OM 3.1.0.rc5, it seems nice enough to warrant giving it a shot.
In terms of maintainability it seems like having the framework code in a plugin could be difficult to work with, but should in theory make it easier to separate base functionality from custom business value code. I guess that's the whole Point of desert/engines, though :P Sent from my iPhone On 15/08/2011, at 11:58 AM, Tim Uckun <[email protected]> wrote: >> Does anybody have any knowledge, experience or wisdom to impart about >> Desert or any comparisons to Rails Engines? >> > > Desert is very nice. IMHO rails should have adopted it instead of > rolling out engines. The rails team does suffer from NIH syndrome > quite a bit. The reason CE went with desert was because Engines didn't > really work until rails 3.0 and even then they were finicky. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
