On 26 August 2011 15:46, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 26 August 2011 15:03, Dmytrii Nagirniak <[email protected]> wrote: > > 1. When rails 3 was released it could not boot even though all tests >> passed. The reason was that boot-up process was stubbed (don't remember >> exact details though). >> > > [citation needed] > > (My main objection is with the word 'released', as if the core Rails team > would release a new version without even using it themselves!) > As I said I don't remember the all the details. Now I doubt it was Rails 3, probably 2. But I agree that 'release' word is inappropriate. Beside that, this is what meant: "Although the Rails initializer tests covered a fair amount of area, successfully getting the tests to pass did not guarantee that Rails booted" http://yehudakatz.com/2009/07/01/new-rails-isolation-testing/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
