Has the list had any experience with static website generators? I'm in the process of reworking our front end teams method of generating websites and I'd like to introduce the use of SASS, CoffeeScript and general good practices (like the use of includes/partials!). The end result will still be HTML/CSS/JS but I want the tools we use to get there to be a bit more sophisticated. This is to enforce better coding and to speed site development up.
I've mocked up and used a prototype system that's similar to how I want the end tool to work. That is, it will watch a folder full of SASS files, CoffeeScript files etc and automatically transform them into there more basic equivalents then compile them together into a single asset file. What I've built is really just a prototype though, and it will need quite a bit more work to get it ready for production and other team members to use. I also don't want to reinvent the wheel. I've looked an nanoc, which looks super powerful, but it might be overkill for what we want. The configuration looks quite complex and some of the people that are going to be using it are junior front end devs that might have come from a design background. In other words, it needs to be somewhat foolproof and easy-ish to use. I've gone through the static websites category on Ruby Toolbox and it seems nanoc is the closest to what we want to use. I'd like it to be fairly mature as well, if possible. Samuel Richardson www.richardson.co.nz | 0405 472 748 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
