On 28/02/2012, at 6:21 PM, Dmytrii Nagirniak wrote: > > On 27/02/2012, at 7:23 PM, Josh Price wrote: > >>> If you guys intend to use HAML, I would suggest use SLIM >> >> It looks quite nice (http://slim-lang.com), has anyone used it? > > I tried it a year ago or so. Worked really well. But didn't use it because of > small missing feature. > Can't remember what that was, but I'm sure it had been added very quickly. > > I've never understood why we need "%percent_before_tag" in HAML :) > I think, this is the only thing that bothers me the most about HAML. >
Well — it's special-character-before-tag, or special-character-before-text. HAML chose the former, Slim chose the latter. Seems to me templates usually contain more tags than blocks of text, so Slim wins on that front. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
