On 21/04/2012, at 11:37 AM, Craig Read wrote: > I was thinking about this late last night, so reread this thread and the > issues. > Seems I totally misread the problem, which made it seem much worse (to me) > than it was. :o > > I thought the issue was not being able to use where(:name => 'blah'), instead > of where(:name => :blah). > The first one would almost definitely be an issue (although, not an > insurmountable one), but I'm not so sure about the second one. > > So I'll revise my original answer accordingly. It doesn't seem like a huge > issue. > You could probably run the rails test suite with this Gem as a dependency, > but I do have my doubts they're using the second form.
After a couple more comments from John and @tenderlove, I think the symbols should not really be used at all. Thus this is probably "not a real issue" and the Squeel should be pretty safe in that area. Thanks for taking time to take a look at that. Cheers. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
