The easy way to see what's wrong with the queries is to see how they look
like in the logs.
Neat trick. I'll remember that. Is there a similar way to get a != version
> of a query? (risking going off topic)
For negative versions you have to write some SQL, like
where('created_at NOT BETWEEN ? AND ?', start, finish)
Regards,
K.
On Friday, October 12, 2012 9:02:40 AM UTC+3, Ben Taylor wrote:
>
> How is Game model defined? My guess is that "game.locations" adds WHERE
> locatable_type='Game' to query clause.
>
> Sorry, to clarify a Game has_many :locations. A game itself isn't
> locatable. Other locatable types are coming through, just not Take.
>
> Of course all these are just guesses cause I dont now how are your models
> defined
>
> Yeah, it's kind of hard to summarise the whole thing really quickly. I
> figured it was better to try and highlight the important bits, than try to
> show you my entire structure.
>
> One trick - instead of
>
> where("created_at > ? AND created_at < ?", start, finish)
>
> you can do
>
> where(created_at: start..finish)
>
> Neat trick. I'll remember that. Is there a similar way to get a != version
> of a query? (risking going off topic)
>
>
> - Ben
>
> On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 4:47 PM, Krasimir Angelov wrote:
>
> Have you checked actual SQL generated in the logs?
>
> How is Game model defined? My guess is that "game.locations" adds WHERE
> locatable_type='Game' to query clause. The second query finds them cause
> locatable_type is set explicitly and overrides the former. Of course all
> these are just guesses cause I dont now how are your models defined.
>
> One trick - instead of
>
> where("created_at > ? AND created_at < ?", start, finish)
>
> you can do
>
> where(created_at: start..finish)
>
> Regards,
> K.
>
>
> On Friday, October 12, 2012 3:31:00 AM UTC+3, Ben Taylor wrote:
>
> Hey there roro-ers,
>
> I'm getting some weird querying inconsistencies and I'm wondering if
> anyone can help me out. I have a model called "Location" which has a
> polymorphic association with a "Locatable".
>
> One of our models didn't correctly create it's associated Location
> objects, so I retro-actively created them like so:
>
> Take.find_each do |t|
> Location.create(
> locatable: t,
> latitude: t.latitude,
> longitude: t.longitude,
> created_at: t.created_at,
> updated_at: t.updated_at
> )
> end
>
> In this case I was lucky because the Take object is only ever located
> once (unlike our Player objects which are located multiple times).
>
> Now I'm currently running a script which visualises activity in our game.
> It goes like this:
>
> frame = []
> locations = game.locations.where("created_at > ? AND created_at < ?",
> start, finish)
> locations = locations.order("created_at ASC")
> puts "Count of takes: #{locations.where(locatable_type: Take.name
> ).count}"
>
> locations.find_each do |loc|
> puts "Found a take!" if loc.locatable_type == Take.name
> if loc.created_at < current
> frame << loc
> else
> while loc.created_at >= current
> write(game, frame, current, frame_length)
> current += frame_length
> frame = []
> end
> frame << loc
> end
> end
>
> So it is querying the DB for all locations between the start and end of
> the game, then putting them into frame_length chunks. The strange
> behaviour I'm seeing is that in our output there are no Locations with
> locatable_type "Take". But when I query the database, they are definitely
> there. The output from running this is:
>
> Doing
> Count of takes: 693
> Done
>
> Which indicates that locatable_type is never Take, but as per the query
> before that they definitely are there.
>
> Any ideas about what I'm doing wrong?
>
> - Ben
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rails-oceania/-/UGKnlmGKucsJ.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected] <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
or Rails Oceania" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rails-oceania/-/Oz14kcgY8bsJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.