>
> In ruby this separation has to be achieved by convention, not the compiler, 
> but I think there's still a lot we can do. In separating concerns and pushing 
> hard in the direction of 'lo-fi', you shrink the attackable surface.
>

I don't understand why Ruby can't put in place a sensible taint
system.  That seems like a logical place to start but it's not on
anybodies radar.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
or Rails Oceania" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to