+1 for Cane. On Friday, July 5, 2013 10:47:21 PM UTC+10, Fred Wu wrote: > > We hook up Cane (https://github.com/square/cane) with our CI - builds > will fail if the code quality tests don't pass. > > On Friday, 5 July 2013 13:20:50 UTC+10, Michael Webb wrote: >> >> Hey all, >> >> I'm fairly new to Ruby and Rails (~1 year), having built an internal >> Rails app for a client, and I'm completely self-taught (from 12+ years C#, >> ASP.NET background). In between sprints I usually get an opportunity to >> poke around on the old Ruby toolbox and try out a few things. The flavour >> of the month this month is Reek. >> >> I love Reek. It has forced me to - substantially - improve my code and >> learn a lot of cool Ruby tricks I might not have otherwise chased down. >> >> I'm curious as to what the community's opinion of Reek is. More >> specifically: >> >> - is it generally accepted as THE code smell detector for Ruby >> developers? >> - are the included smells generally accepted "as is" or are there >> common variations? (I had to up the number of lines per method to 12, for >> example, less simply wasn't possible in our app) >> - what are the alternatives, and how do they compare to Reek? >> >> Interested to hear your thoughts. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Mike >> >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
