It looked cool (I installed it and toyed around with it a little), but I can’t imagine having to switch to it whenever I want to work on _javascript_.  Would be better, IMO, to make plugins for existing editors that do the same stuff.  I could use one for Komodo J  As it is, unless I need to do some serious js debugging (which is rare), throwing in alerts or logging is faster than switching to a totally different IDE.

 

Others may feel differently.

 

Greg

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brandon Aaron
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 4:15 PM
To: rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org
Subject: Re: [Rails-spinoffs] Re: Documenting Prototype...

 

Has anyone else actually tried out this IDE Aptana (http://www.aptana.com/)? You know ... the reason this thread was started.

Looks pretty interesting; however, I'm a TextMate fanatic and ever since have immediately had doubts about other editors. I might try it out later on today if I can find the time.

On 7/20/06, Peter Michaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 7/20/06, Alex Duffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is a list for those who WANT to use prototype.

With Rails in the name of this mailing list, Prototype.js being in
Rails svn and Prototype.js's direct integration in Rails core, this is
also an appropriate place to discuss the future connection of
Prototype.js and Rails. I am concerned about the long term success of
Rails not Prototype.js.
_______________________________________________
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
Rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs

 

_______________________________________________
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
Rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs

Reply via email to