RE: [Rails-spinoffs] XML Question

[Hill, Greg]

Title: Message

Is Prototype’s inspect function recursive?  If it is, then $H(results).inspect() would work.  Otherwise, you’ll have to come up with your own recursive function.   Greg   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 12:33 PM To: rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org Subject: RE: [Rails-spinoffs] XML Question   Greg,   OK, there's objects in objects.  Nice...   For debugging purposes, what's the simplest way to convert the entire returned object to a string for inspection?   Sam -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hill, Greg Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 1:57 PM To: rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org Subject: RE: [Rails-spinoffs] XML Question Well, I’m sure xPath is a lot more flexible, but holy crap is that a lot of code.  As I said, mine is limited, but serves my purposes very well.  And it’s generic enough for anyone to use, although it only handles node types 1 to 3.  Anything beyond that will be ignored (or possibly break it, I haven’t tested it thoroughly against other node types).   http://www.devguru.com/Technologies/xmldom/quickref/obj_node.html#types (node type information)   Greg   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 11:43 AM To: rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org Subject: RE: [Rails-spinoffs] XML Question   Thanks (a lot! ).  I've had to rule out including a 100Kb xPath.js library.  Maybe this lib is a better solution.   I diagnosed the problem with IE responseXML - if the file isn't served "up" as text/xml, IE doesn't make responseXML available.  (I was testing on my local hard-disk / no server).  Posting to a server solves this problem.  I can (will) live with that.   Sam

_______________________________________________
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
Rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs