Hi, I agree with you Kasun. I think the approach we should promote is using the trust_context structure. This will enable a consistent implementations in client side as well as server side.
Regards, Supun.. On 2/14/08, Kasun Indrasiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > In the Trust implementation, we have used sts_client to interfacing client > programmer and trust module. Our main objective is to ease the work of a > user has to do when he is using the trust module by doing most of the work > inside the > sts_client. But this approch not restricts the user from following > the common approach when we are using a svc_client. Any user can use > the normal approach other than > using sts_client. > > But if are going to restrict only ro sts_client, we have have to do sevaral > unwanted delegations. So, I think we can add another sample case which not > strictly depending on sts_client. (I thinks we currently have one similar to > this in secpolicy scenario 20 which deals with RST Template and Trust) > > Thanks, > Kasun >
