i wouldnt mind testing at all, atm running a 800c cluster on 5.2, and expecting a 500e cluster with 5.6 by the end of the month.
// nick > On 03 Aug 2018, at 22:08, heasley <h...@shrubbery.net> wrote: > > Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 03:34:05PM +0000, Nick Nauwelaerts: >> i guess the fortinet module could use some polishing. it does a great job >> for getting a complete running config backup. but other information could >> certainly be welcome to. >> >> perhaps i'll have a look at converting it to a library later on, then you >> can just comment out the modules you have no interest in. but that will have >> to wait until i get aerohive hiveos polished a bit. > > i'll convert it, but someone needs to commit to testing it for me, since i > have none of these devices. > >> // nick >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rancid-discuss [mailto:rancid-discuss-boun...@shrubbery.net] On Behalf >> Of heasley >> Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 00:16 >> To: Chris Wopat <m...@falz.net> >> Cc: rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net >> Subject: Re: [rancid] Fortigate additional tweaks and device filters >> >> Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 09:25:30AM -0500, Chris Wopat: >>>> Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 08:37:03AM +0000, Nick Nauwelaerts: >>>>> hm, >>>>> i actually like to have those versions in the output. if something breaks >>>>> my first reaction tends to be: "what changed?", and rancid is usually the >>>>> first place i check. >>>>> >>>>> would it be an option to control this with FILTER_OSC , even though its >>>>> not quite it's intended application? >>>> Could be; what are they? version stamp of what exactly? >>> >>> >>> My additions to filter are based on the fact that there's already a >>> block of these being filtered, this is just 'more of the same' chatty >>> stuff that changes daily. >>> >>> I'd say go one way or another- add more similar filters (my suggestion) >>> or do none or have a toggle-able option. FILTER_OSC sounds more like >>> it's for security stuff, so that doesn't seem like the best fit to me. >>> >>> Has a new FILTER_CRUFT type of option been discussed in the past? Unsure >>> if this fits the category of any other previously discussed things. >> >> it was intended for stuff that oscillated but is still desirable (by some). >> so, seems to fit the application, perhaps for the other similar filters. >> again, i dont know the platform, so I need input. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Rancid-discuss mailing list >> Rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net >> http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss >> >> ________________________________ >> >> Volg Aquafin op Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/AquafinNV> | >> Twitter<https://twitter.com/aquafinnv> | >> YouTube<http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCk_4P5BJ-MtEEDCkCsR_KqQ?feature=mhee> >> | LinkedIN<http://www.linkedin.com/company/aquafin/products> >> >> In het kader van de uitoefening van onze taken verzamelen we bij Aquafin >> persoonsgegevens. Hoe we omgaan met deze gegevens en wat de rechten van de >> betrokkenen zijn, kan je nalezen in onze privacy >> policy<https://www.aquafin.be/nl-be/privacy-policy>. >> >> [https://www.aquafin.be/sites/aquafin/files/styles/paragraph_with_caption/public/2018-06/email_banner_web.jpg]<https://www.aquafin.be/> >> P Denk aan het milieu. Druk deze mail niet onnodig af. _______________________________________________ Rancid-discuss mailing list Rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss
