I think the key to this folly is the statement you made: "according to several websites". Which, among several tens of thousands on any given subject, one should have no problem finding a few (or several) which contain less than accurate historical information. The case still remains that there are the two distinct methods of finding the solution to the problem, which was and still is the original point of contention brought up by you, and which seems to have fallen to the wayside in your most recent discourse, quite understandably. (You simply had no other leg to stand upon.) This was , and still is, where you are mistaken. The two methods are not the same. For instance, take a right triangle with two legs of 7" and 20" and x" as the hypotenuse. The 3-4-5 method will not be applicable in this case, but the pythagorean theorem will. 7x7=49 20x20=400. 49+400=449 square root of 449=21.18962" - the hypotenuse. The most widely accepted view is that Pythagoras is credited with the theorem which is named after him. In fact, this is the first time I have actually heard of anyone attempting to contest that. My source, for the sake of time and convenience, shall be : Funk and Wagnalls Standard Dictionary Under the definition of the word: Pythagorean theorem (pi THag e REE en) Geom. the theorem of Pythagoras that the sum of the squares of the legs of a right triangle is equal to the square of the hypotenuse. What seems to have occured here, both in your supposition and in your subsequent website research, is a confusion of the Pythagorean theorem and the 3-4-5 method. While the Pythagorean theorem will apply in the 3-4-5 case, as it will in any right triangle, the 3-4-5 method depends upon triangles with multiples thereof, providing further proof both of the distinctiveness of the two methods and the falseness of your original claim that they are the same. BTW, the most widely accepted view by historians is that the egyptians developed the 3-4-5 method for use in the cornfields. No need for me to reference that, it's just simple common knowledge that I've been aware of since high school geometry, and that will stand on it's own merit. Myself, I think Job came up with it, but that's another story.
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com |
- Re: [RR] Let's take a test-ANSWERS iwannabe infcf
- Re: [RR] Let's take a test-ANSWERS NTexRR194
- Re: [RR] Let's take a test-ANSWERS clint grant
- Re: [RR] Let's take a test-ANSWERS NTexRR194
- Re: [RR] Let's take a test-ANSWERS clint grant
- Re: [RR] Let's take a test-ANSWERS NTexRR194
- Re: [RR] Let's take a test-ANSWERS clint grant
- Re: [RR] Let's take a test-ANSWERS NTexRR194
