Once in a linguistics lecture, the professor was explaining that in some 
languages, like English, it is improper to use a double negative, as it 
could be misconstrued as a positive. For example, "Don't give me no pickles 
on my hamburger," might result in no pickles -- or it could result in 
pickles. However, in some languages, like Spanish, a double negative is 
proper, and not repeating the negative as in the above example could result 
in confusion. Then, with some satisfaction, he said "At least there is no 
language where a double positive results in a negative."

At that, a voice spoke up from the back of the classroom, contradicting him 
with a sarcastic "Yeah! Right!"

Could someone tell me if a bigger traffic bottleneck is better or worse 
than a smaller one? Or are they both worse?

In email communications, we lack the ability to hear the tone of voice or 
see the face of the writer. Sometimes we insert little "emoticons" like 
:-(   :-)  >:-(   :-))  :-O  or something to give a clue, but often those 
aren't used, either. This can make communications difficult when we don't 
know the writer, and make false assumptions about his or her attitude. For 
example, I was surprised recently to learn that a dear brother in the Lord 
totally misunderstood something I wrote. I wrote "I am waiting patiently 
for an answer," and he read it as having a sarcastic tone that I never 
intended (thus reading exactly the opposite of what the words literally 
say). I meant it literally. When I saw the response to my email, I decided 
not to try to answer with email again, but over the telephone, so he could 
hear my voice. It worked much better.

As I have seen email discussions in both Christian and secular areas, I 
have noticed some tendencies towards "flame wars" that can start way too 
easily. First, there is a curious tendency to not react in writing to 
particularly good posts. A really good posting might get a request for 
permission to reprint it in a newsletter or a complement, but most people 
read it, possibly use it with their outposts, smile, and go on. The flip 
side of this is that there is a piranha-like tendency to attack when 
someone says something outrageous, offensive, controversial, or wrong -- 
even if the comment is merely misread by many. On a mailing list, this can 
be overwhelming, especially the first time someone commits a net faux pas. 
On the other hand, there are some people who actually do this on purpose to 
get people angry and get attention, especially on nonchristian mailing 
lists and Usenet news groups.

With all of the above hazards, why do we even bother with stuff like 
RangerNet? Because most of the time, we get to share in enjoyable 
fellowship with people who have a common interest, like reaching, teaching, 
and keeping boys and girls for Jesus Christ. We can share devotions, lesson 
plan ideas, games, and more. We can discuss the Bible as it applies to our 
outposts and lives. We can get feedback and support from others who may 
have a little more wisdom in a problem area. We can discuss new ideas in a 
mostly nonthreatening environment. We have a forum here in which all Royal 
Rangers, Commanders, and others interested in Royal Rangers can speak and 
be heard. It isn't "official" nor is it controlled very tightly by anyone, 
but often times official news gets repeated here. It is also true that 
sometimes someone blows off some steam. As long as it is done in love and 
in accordance with the Royal Ranger code, that is OK, although some of this 
may have contributed to RangerNet's bad reputation among a few people.

There is not much control is exercised here, but there is some. Twice in 
the history of RangerNet, someone has been kicked off of the list for bad 
conduct. (If you are reading this, it wasn't you.) Don't assume, however, 
that if you got kicked off of the mailing list that it was for bad conduct, 
unless you were told so. This is because several email addresses are 
removed from RangerNet every day for bounced mail, and several addresses 
are added back again by people resubscribing themselves. If your mailbox 
size exceeds its quota or several other possible things, some of which may 
be temporary, this happens. Just clear out your inbox on your ISP, and 
resubscribe yourself at http://rangernet.org/subscribe.htm or use the 
majordomo email interface to resubscribe yourself. For the most part, what 
we do to keep the conversation civil is keep the Royal Ranger code. We also 
post the FAQ and the "Rhinoceros Hide" document periodically in hopes of 
setting the tone. You have read them, right?


Michael Paul Johnson
aka Soaring Golden Eagle
PO Box 1151, Longmont CO 80502-1151, USA
Rocky Mountain outpost 207, New Creation Church
Jesus Christ is Lord!


_______
 To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe rangernet" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 "Eat the hay & spit out the sticks! - A#1's mule"     RTKB&G4JC!
 http://rangernet.org    Autoresponder: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to