Salam untuk semua netters Rantaunet.
 
Perkenalken, saya Keke Widagdo temanya Evi yang sedang ikut ngintip milis Rantaunet di rumah Evi. Berhubung nyonya rumah meminta pendapat saya seputar posting Rarach ttg isu gender, saya tuliskan sedikit. Permisi.
 
You are good for this, Rach!  Then there is further question of what is the relationship of thinking lady like to reality. As careful attention shows, thought being women or men itself is in an actual process of movement. That is to say, one can feel a sense of flow being ladies  in the stream of consciousness of gents doesnt similar to the sense of flow in both gender as a matter of fact in general. May not gender thought itself thus be a part
of absurd reality as a whole? But then, what could it mean for one part of
gender to 'know' one another, and to what extent would this be possible?
 
Biarkan Evi yang menangani jawaban Rarach (itupun kalau nyonya ini tidak cari-cari alasan untuk mengelak). Saya mau makan nasi pecel dulu. Rarach atau ada saudara-saudara Rantaunet mau ikut gabung? Silahkan asal yang punya rumah tidak keberatan.
 
Keke Widagdo
 

----- Original Message -----
From: rarachm
 
---is that so important?
is singer more important than the song?
ahh, itu namanya tidak demokrasi dong.----
 

talking like a lady is a patrileineal words; to keep lady under
pressured to follow men rules.  padusi indak buliah main oto-oto,
padusi indak buliah main bola, padusi indak cocok jadi supir oto. 
laki-laki indak buliah mancuci piriang, indak buliah mamotong
bawang...

nan lamak-lamak ka anak laki-laki, nan karajo rumah ka anak padusi.
that's a patrilineal world in matrilineal tribe.

satu lagi, ini pepatah minang yang udah direformasi:

kamanakan barajo ka mamak
mamak barajo ka panghulu
panghulu barajo ka mufakaik
mufakaik baraja ka demokrasi...

~rarach


Kirim email ke