Cigoklah Pantai Barat Sumatera dari Piaman ilia mudiak dalam penting 
strategisnya ke Masa Depan di Indian Ocean Rim.

-- Mak Ngah
Sjamsir Sjarif

FEATURESDIPLOMACYSOUTH ASIAINDONESIA
Indonesia: A Potential Leader in the Indian Ocean
Image Credit: REUTERS/Damir Sagolj
Indonesia: A Potential Leader in the Indian Ocean
Indonesia is well placed to play a leading role in developing a better regional 
architecture for the Indian Ocean.

By Awidya Santikajaya
December 12, 2014
 831  7 31 
869 Shares
 
On his recent trips to the APEC, ASEAN and G20 summits, Indonesian President 
Joko Widodo spoke of how he saw Indonesia’s role as a “global maritime axis.” 
Recognizing Indonesia’s status as the world’s largest archipelagic state and 
its location at the crossroads of the Indian and Pacific oceans, Widodo 
emphasized the importance of making Indonesia’s strategic maritime position the 
cornerstone of foreign policy. This new policy raises an interesting question: 
How will Indonesia define its position in Indian Ocean, given its role as next 
year’s chair of the Indian Ocean Rim Association (IORA).

For decades the main focus of Indonesia’s diplomacy has been ASEAN and its 
northern region. This makes sense, particularly given close economic times 
between Indonesia and countries in East Asia (both Northeast and Southeast). 
Now, with his maritime vision, Widodo intends to expand Indonesia’s active 
diplomatic presence from merely ASEAN-centric to the broader Indo-Pacific arena.

But if it is to play an effective and constructive role, Indonesia will need to 
carefully understand the Indian Ocean region and be clear on what it actually 
could contribute.

Underdeveloped Regional Architecture

The Indian Ocean is growing in strategic and economic importance. Approximately 
20 percent of global sea trade is carried through its waters. A recent study by 
the French Institute for the Exploitation of the Sea revealed that ship traffic 
in the Indian Ocean has grown by more than 300 percent over the last twenty 
years. Understanding the strategic significance of the Indian Ocean, its 
littoral and island states have been taking steps to bolster their naval 
capabilities.

As a result, the Indian Ocean is now home to some of the world’s largest 
defense budgets. For instance, India allocated $5.8 billion on modernizing and 
expanding its navy in 2014, becoming the largest spender in the Indian Ocean 
region. Among other purposes, the money was used to complete its aircraft 
carrier Vikrant and activate the reactor aboard the Arihant.

Meanwhile, China was heavily involved in the construction of ports in Myanmar, 
Bangladesh, Pakistan, Seychelles and Maldives. Although Chinese officials were 
at pains to insist that these ports are being built entirely for commercial 
purposes, the growing Chinese military contacts and economic assistance in the 
region has raised questions about its long-term naval ambitions for the Indian 
Ocean.

The naval buildup in the Indian Ocean itself raises security questions. 
However, the situation is further complicated by other persistent issues, such 
as piracy (particularly off the coast of Somalia), the existence of states that 
are non-signatories to the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and the unclear future of 
the U.S. military power projection from Diego Garcia. These increasingly 
complex security challenges are unfortunately not being well managed.

The regional architecture in the Pacific region provides a contrast. Certainly, 
there are ongoing disputes in East Asia, with tensions in the South China Sea 
and the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands, but a phalanx of multilateral forums, from 
ASEAN and its “plus” schemes to APEC, offer a strong basis for the countries of 
East Asia to cooperate and uphold the common interest.

In the Indian Ocean region, however, the regional security architecture is 
underdeveloped. The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) 
consistently stumbles on India-Pakistan rivalry. This leaves the IORA, 
previously the Indian Ocean Rim Association for Regional Cooperation (IOR-ARC), 
as the only pan-regional forum with the potential to manage complex relations 
in the Indian Ocean.

Recent years have seen some efforts to strengthen the IORA. As the current 
chair, Australia has proposed economic cooperation initiatives, such as IORA 
Business Week and an economic declaration, setting up a fund of $1 million to 
boost economic activities in the Indian Ocean region. More importantly, IORA 
has begun to recognize maritime security as one of its main priorities, as 
revealed at the 13th IORA’s Meeting of the Council of Ministers (MCM) in Perth 
last month.

These positive developments notwithstanding, IORA’s progress has been modest. 
It faces at least three main challenges. First, the IORA is not yet an 
effective institution. It was designed as an ambitious grouping with interest 
in too many complex areas, including maritime security, trade and investment, 
fisheries management, cultural exchange, and many more. Since its establishment 
in 1997 it has been unable to effectively cover these areas. Economic 
cooperation initiatives and people-to-people links within the IORA framework 
are still very limited, albeit with some small improvements of late.

Second, the Indian Ocean lacks a regional identity and is plagued by 
considerable distrust. The distinct differences among the states that span a 
vast area from Australia to South Africa make it difficult for the IORA to 
define any common interest. Limited security cooperation and joint exercises 
are not enough to address the fragile balance of power. True, there have been 
some security cooperation initiatives beyond the IORA, such as Milan and the 
Indian Ocean Naval Symposium (IONS), but those arrangements are focused on 
operational matters, are had little to do with policy and strategy. More 
importantly, the current initiatives do not effectively accommodate external 
powers. China, the United States and a few other nations have become IORA 
dialogue partners, but the current arrangements give them little scope to play 
constructive roles.

Finally, the Indian Ocean rim lacks the political will to set up an effective 
regional institution. The highest-level meeting help by the IORA at present is 
a council of foreign ministers; there is as yet not summit of heads of 
government. The various IORA working groups are handled by senior officials or 
at even more junior levels. Security meetings involve the chiefs of navies, not 
defense ministers.

A Role for Indonesia

Clearly, to avoid a runaway rivalry for regional power and influence, greater 
efforts to maintain regional stability in the Indian Ocean are needed. And it 
is here that Indonesia could play a role, helping to strengthen the IORA and 
turn it into a respected, mature regional forum.

Widely recognized as a longstanding proponent of regionalism in East Asia, 
Indonesia is well placed to encourage the same in the Indian Ocean. As the 
primus inter pares in ASEAN, Indonesia has sought to promote norms by 
initiating a significant number of ASEAN documents, such as the ASEAN Charter. 
One important Indonesian legacy in ASEAN is the Treaty of Amity of Cooperation 
(TAC), which became a central element for promoting peace and cooperation. 
Together with other ASEAN countries, Indonesia also successfully included the 
major powers in the Pacific in the East Asia Summit (EAS), which is anchored by 
ASEAN. Moreover, in the Indian Ocean, Indonesia has no conflict with any other 
state. In cooperation with Malaysia and Singapore, Indonesia even offers an 
example of trilateral security cooperation through the Malacca Strait Sea 
Patrol.

For its two-year chairmanship of the IORA, which will commence less than one 
year from now, there are at least five main reforms Indonesia could consider. 
First, to conceptually carve out shared interests and norms, Indonesia could 
propose a TAC-like treaty for the IORA. An Indian Ocean treaty of friendship 
and cooperation could build trust and attenuate suspicions. The current IORA 
charter only addresses the economic objectives of the association, and does not 
cover the increasingly pivotal security and safety elements.

Second, Indonesia could propose that the peak IORA decision-making body be 
elevated from the council of foreign ministers to the summit level. This would 
be an important step in encouraging political will among IORA members. With a 
regular summit, IORA will move from the project-by-project agenda it has 
pursued for years, to a more systematic and structured strategic focus. 
Meanwhile, there should be more meetings at the ministerial level, including 
between IORA defense ministers. A defense ministers forum would be crucial to 
address security issues more comprehensively and to facilitate confidence 
building measures among IORA members.

Third, Indonesia could help accelerate the ascension of Myanmar, Maldives, and 
even Somalia to IORA membership. It could also approach Pakistan, which is 
currently not an IORA member despite its status as a littoral state. The more 
inclusive IORA becomes, the more legitimacy it has to build trust within the 
region.

Fourth, IORA should be more effective at bringing its dialogue partners into 
its broader cooperation projects. It is vital that external powers do not feel 
marginalized from any initiatives and processes in IORA. Dialogue partners 
should be encouraged to participate in IORA projects, including policy-setting 
and security dialogues. A formal meeting between IORA and its dialogue partners 
could be modeled after the EAS, where EAS leaders usually meet for one day 
directly after ASEAN leaders conclude a two-day summit.

Finally, Indonesia could develop an action plan for both the short and long 
terms, so that the IORA has better tools and guidelines to monitor the 
effectiveness of its cooperation projects. The association needs to define 
tangible outcomes that could be achieved within a certain timeframe. Learning 
from ASEAN, which define its objectives in the three pillars of the ASEAN 
Community, IORA could select a limited number of priorities with clear purposes 
and instruments, instead of working on wildly ambitious but hollow commitments.

If Indonesia intends to reinvigorate IORA, it needs to start preparing to do so 
now. One particularly urgent task is setting up a research institute/think 
tank, focusing specifically on Indian Ocean issues, which Indonesia currently 
lacks. This institution could play a crucial role as a leading actor in Track 
II diplomacy and give the Indonesian government better outreach on IORA 
projects both domestically and internationally.

Indonesia has the potential to influence the direction and shape the dynamic of 
the Indian Ocean region. Referring to its diplomatic eloquence in the Southeast 
Asia and Pacific regions, Indonesia could constructively remake IORA as the 
premier regional forum for cooperation. 

Awidya Santikajaya is a PhD candidate at the Asia-Pacific College of Diplomacy, 
The Australian National University.

You have read 2 of your 5 free articles this month.
Subscribe to
Diplomat All-Access
Enjoy full access to the website and get an automatic subscription to our 
magazine with a Diplomat All-Access subscription.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Already a subscriber? Login here


TopicsFeaturesDiplomacySouth AsiaIndonesia
TagsDiego GarciaIndian Ocean RegionIndian Ocean Rim AssociationIndonesia in the 
Indian OceanJoko Widodo

-- 
.
* Posting yg berasal dari Palanta RantauNet, dipublikasikan di tempat lain 
wajib mencantumkan sumber: ~dari Palanta R@ntauNet~ 
* Isi email, menjadi tanggung jawab pengirim email.
===========================================================
UNTUK DIPERHATIKAN, yang melanggar akan dimoderasi:
* DILARANG:
  1. Email besar dari 200KB;
  2. Email attachment, tawarkan & kirim melalui jalur pribadi; 
  3. Email One Liner.
* Anggota WAJIB mematuhi peraturan (lihat di http://goo.gl/MScz7) serta 
mengirimkan biodata!
* Tulis Nama, Umur & Lokasi disetiap posting
* Hapus footer & seluruh bagian tdk perlu dlm melakukan reply
* Untuk topik/subjek baru buat email baru, tdk mereply email lama & mengganti 
subjeknya.
===========================================================
Berhenti, bergabung kembali, mengubah konfigurasi/setting keanggotaan di: 
http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/
--- 
Anda menerima pesan ini karena Anda berlangganan grup "RantauNet" dari Google 
Grup.
Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, kirim 
email ke [email protected].
Untuk opsi lainnya, kunjungi https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Kirim email ke