Bung Andi Ko, saya sudah baca cepat-cepat dokumen Oxfam ttg kebencanaan ini, khususnya ttg kesimpulan dan rekomendasinya. Seperti dapat kita duga, persiapan Sumatera Barat terbatas pada sosialisasi dan belum mencakup investasi yang diperlukan utk mitigasi bencana. Kesimpulan dan rekomendasi ini tentu bukan sekedar untuk dibaca, tetapi utk ditindaklanjuti. Ada dua pilihan: dibahas di Sumbar, atau kita bahas di Jakarta. Mana yg lebih tepat menurut bung Andi Ko ? Saafroedin Bahar. Taqdir di tangan Allah swt, nasib di tangan kita.
-----Original Message----- From: andi ko <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 10:24:07 To: RantauNet<[email protected]> Reply-To: [email protected] Subject: [...@ntau-net] Dealing with Disasters A Review of Disaster Risk Reduction Investments in West Java and West Sumatra Oxfam Research Report: Dealing with Disasters A Review of Disaster Risk Reduction Investments in West Java and West Sumatra ------------------------------ By djuni - Posted on 04 January 2011 *OXFAM RESEARCH REPORT* Dealing with Disasters A Review of Disaster Risk Reduction Investments in West Java and West Sumatra, Indonesia Saut Sagala Regional and Rural Planning Research Group School of Architecture, Planning and Policy Development, Institute of Technology Bandung, Indonesia September 2010 *Executive Summary* Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) Investment covers a ranges of activities that include time, effort and energy spent with the aim of reducing disaster risks. This research assesses the extent to which the previous DRR investment in two provinces in Indonesia (West Java and West Sumatra) have contributed to the reduction of risk and vulnerabilities of communities. The objective of the research is to identify how DRR investments have developed and contributed to reduce the impacts in recent earthquakes in Indonesia. The results of the research will be shared with the government, Non-Government Organization, and education institution working in DRR. Donwload Dealing with Disasters A Review of Disaster Risk Reduction Investments in West Java and West Sumatra<http://www.mpbi.org/files/pustaka/20100900-oxfam-itb_dealing-with-disaster_review-drr-invesment-west-java-west-sumatra.pdf> Drawing on the Hyogo Framework of Action, this research selected seven characteristic of DRR Investments to be examined: Institutional and legislative frameworks, risk assessment, early warning systems, public awareness, education and training, research, and community participation. The study employed qualitative and quantitative research methodology. The report is organized into four chapters. Chapter 1 is the background of the study while. Chapter 2 draws the mapping of the DRR investments based on types of activities, types of activities implemented by actors and inclusion of gender issues. Chapter 3 examines the findings and analysis and finally, Chapter 4 provides the conclusion and recommendation. *The study’s findings and conclusions are as follows:* - The priority of DRR investments in West Java and West Sumatra is mostly in public awareness, disaster education and training. The main actors who invest in DRR are government and NGOs (INGO and local NGO). - Gender mainstreaming is still found to be rare in both provinces although NGOs are found to be more sensitive to gender. Therefore cooperation between government and NGOs may make more gender sensitive programs. - The Ministry of Women Empowerment (MOWE) does not have capacity to mainstream gender in government programs. This is because the MOWE authority is limited. Similarly, the agency of women empowerment’s power is also limited to districts and large cities. As a result risk reduction measures are less effective for women as risk assessments are not gender sensitive. - The number of victims in West Sumatera was still substantial, largely due to the collapsing of buildings This shows that structural mitigation is still not of high importance to the government - Most investment tends to focus on specific types of hazards, with earthquakes and tsunamis having the highest investment. This shows an imbalance in investment between earthquakes and tsunamis and other types of hazards. - Disaster education while conducted at some formal education institutions (public schools) is still limited. Disaster education, however, is not being taught at informal education institutions, such as courses. - EWS tend to emphasize the technological components of the warning systems and are not people centred. Applied research on DRR is still limited. Most of the research is found on physical modelling of hazards with only limited on socio-economic issues. - The involvement of the private sector is very limited. - NGOs traditionally work in rural areas but not in urban areas. - Government policies on disaster management are not based on strong risk assessment. - Participatory projects have been seen to be effective as a result of the increased awareness of the communities. However, the participation of the communities is still limited. Therefore, more investment must be done to ensure community active role in disaster risk reduction activities. *Several recommendations were suggested:* - The scale of investment must consider the size of population and area vulnerable to disaster. The current scale of investment is not yet meeting the needs and must be expanded. - Investment should also cover sectors that traditionally not addressed by NGOs, such as structural mitigation that requires skills and bigger resources and stronger regulation. This can be addressed by improving the enabling environment, including laws and building codes and involving more actors that have the competence , e.g. private sectors. - Ministry of Women Empowerment and Children Protection should be supported to enable them to advocate for the mainstreaming of gender into DRR and emergency response. At the same time, NGOs, especially gender focused NGOs, should also work more closely and advocate the newly established BPBDs to mainstream gender into their organizations and programmes. - Good lessons from participatory DRR projects should be scaled up to other vulnerable communities. - To speed up the disaster management institutions and legislation to vulnerable districts, awareness and education should target decision makers (legislative and executive). The established BPBDs should strengthen their coordination function and leadership. - Education should not only cover formal education but also informal education. This is not only on knowledge but also on the structural mitigation and safety. Disaster education should also include knowledge of secondary hazards (e.g. landslides and fires can be induced by earthquakes). - Risk analysis should be used as a foundation for any disaster risk reduction investments. The results from individual project risk analysis (by community based approach) should be used to fit with the government risk analysis. On the other level, BPBDs should develop participatory risk analysis mechanisms to enable more systematic and comprehensive risk reduction systems. To ensure synchronization of various risk analysis methodology, BPBD should conduct dialogue (such as DRR Forum) on risk analysis and gender sensitive indicators. - Existing EWS should strengthen their community components and cover the other prominent hazards (floods and landslides). - More social research into disaster risk reductions. Funding for social research in disaster risk reduction should be increased - All investments will require additional financial and other resources. Government and donors should increase their financial support but also it is important to identify alternative sources of funds, for example: the potential use of climate change adaptation funds. -- . * Posting yg berasal dari Palanta RantauNet, dipublikasikan di tempat lain wajib mencantumkan sumber: ~dari Palanta r...@ntaunet http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/~ * Isi email, menjadi tanggung jawab pengirim email. =========================================================== UNTUK DIPERHATIKAN, melanggar akan dimoderasi: - DILARANG: 1. E-mail besar dari 200KB; 2. E-mail attachment, tawarkan di sini & kirim melalui jalur pribadi; 3. One Liner. - Anggota WAJIB mematuhi peraturan serta mengirim biodata! Lihat di: http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/web/peraturan-rantaunet - Tulis Nama, Umur & Lokasi disetiap posting - Hapus footer & seluruh bagian tdk perlu dlm melakukan reply - Untuk topik/subjek baru buat email baru, tdk mereply email lama & mengganti subjeknya. =========================================================== Berhenti, bergabung kembali, mengubah konfigurasi/setting keanggotaan di: http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/subscribe. -- . * Posting yg berasal dari Palanta RantauNet, dipublikasikan di tempat lain wajib mencantumkan sumber: ~dari Palanta r...@ntaunet http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/~ * Isi email, menjadi tanggung jawab pengirim email. =========================================================== UNTUK DIPERHATIKAN, melanggar akan dimoderasi: - DILARANG: 1. E-mail besar dari 200KB; 2. E-mail attachment, tawarkan di sini & kirim melalui jalur pribadi; 3. One Liner. - Anggota WAJIB mematuhi peraturan serta mengirim biodata! Lihat di: http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/web/peraturan-rantaunet - Tulis Nama, Umur & Lokasi disetiap posting - Hapus footer & seluruh bagian tdk perlu dlm melakukan reply - Untuk topik/subjek baru buat email baru, tdk mereply email lama & mengganti subjeknya. =========================================================== Berhenti, bergabung kembali, mengubah konfigurasi/setting keanggotaan di: http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/subscribe.
