I'm not convinced that including the war products is worth marking the whole package as "incubation".
1) The package is used by RCP developers as well and downloaded quite often, the incubation warning might scare more users away than would actually benefit from the war products. Last year, there was the same discussion about including EGit, it had been rejected because of its incubation state. 2) The war products feature is very easy to install from the Juno repository that is already configured in the IDE. 3) Including the war products would not make this feature easier to find. Without reading the documentation, you wouldn't know that it's there, neither how to use it. However, it's a trade-off. If you have a strong feeling towards including it, you should open a bug against EPP. Apart from this, we should check with the Libra guys about their plans. If they can provide a release version next year, it will surely be included. With RC1 already built, it's too late for Juno anyway, I guess. Regards, Ralf On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Frank Gerhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue 15 May 2012 06:48:38 PM CEST, Frank Appel wrote: >> Rüdiger told me so yesterday too, which brings me back to my original >> Opinion.. :-) > > I'd also rather include it. A colleague used it for a few months > already and I learned about it only last week. Why not make the UX > better? > > Frank. > > _______________________________________________ > rap-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rap-dev _______________________________________________ rap-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rap-dev
