Hi,

I just posted the same message in the CBI-Dev Mailinglist. I think that the 
following was caused by the RAP Luna M5 contribution:


I've just discovered that there are two different bundles of 
org.eclipse.core.runtime with versions 3.10.0.v20131008-1415 and 
3.10.0.v20140123-0905 at the Staging update site [1].
I assume that the older bundle version was aggregated by the RAP feature 
org.eclipse.rap.equinox.target.feature_2.3.0.20131213-1302.jar located at [2] 
(the Luna M5 contribution of the RAP project).
Because of the version mismatch, we cannot aggregate our Scout RAP runtime 
since our Scout RAP feature uses the bundle org.eclipse.core.runtime in version 
3.10.0.v20140123-0905 which I guess should be the correct one for Luna M5.

What can we do now? Does the RAP project need to aggregate their contribution 
again?

Cheers,

Ken

[1] http://download.eclipse.org/releases/staging/
[2] http://download.eclipse.org/rt/rap/2.3/M1-20140127-1357

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Markus Knauer
Sent: Montag, 27. Januar 2014 19:37
To: RAP project development-related communication
Subject: [rap-dev] RAP 2.3M1 for Luna M5

Hi RAP developers,
here's our RAP 2.3M1 candidate for Luna M5:
RAP Runtime:
Build: https://hudson.eclipse.org/rap/view/RAP%20head/job/rap-head-runtime/137/
p2 repository: http://download.eclipse.org/rt/rap/2.3/M1-20140127-1357/

RAP Tools:
Build: https://hudson.eclipse.org/rap/view/RAP%20head/job/rap-head-tools/118/
p2 repository: http://download.eclipse.org/rt/rap/tools/2.3/M1-20140121-1742/

Both builds are already contributed to the Luna M5 p2 repository.

Thanks,
Markus

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
rap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rap-dev

Reply via email to