On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[email protected]> wrote:

> the current pipeline is very fine with claims pushing up individually,
> with potentially many claims for each subject. i think it'd probably be
> easier to understand if the pipeline were courser, with each resource
> collecting claims (and other meta-data) during analysis then being
> passed as a unit to the reporting subsystem.
>
> opinions?

Would be good - basically the pipeline readers are doing nothing than
collecting anyways.

Jochen


-- 
Don't trust a government that doesn't trust you.

Reply via email to