> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, 28 May 2009 4:36 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: building rat...
> 
> scott comer wrote:
> > maybe you know better than me, but i see something:
> >
> > [INFO] [site:attach-descriptor]
> > [INFO] Unable to load parent project from a relative path: Could not
> > find the model file 'C:\wks\pom.xml'. for project unknown
> > [INFO] Parent project loaded from repository.
> 
> maven seems to complain of this a lot. usually doesn't seem to matter.
> (hard to tell for sure without running at debug.)
> 
> > allTests:
> > [au:antunit] Build File:
> > C:\wks\rat\apache-rat-tasks\src\test\resources\antunit\report-normal-
> operation.xml
> >
> > [au:antunit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0.703
> sec
> > [au:antunit] Target: testCustomMatcherSentToFile  caused an ERROR
> > [au:antunit]     at line 173, column 43
> > [au:antunit]     Message: Unable to find a javac compiler;
> > [au:antunit] com.sun.tools.javac.Main is not on the classpath.
> > [au:antunit] Perhaps JAVA_HOME does not point to the JDK.
> > [au:antunit] It is currently set to "C:\Program
> Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_11\jre"
> >
> >
> > (note, my environment variable JAVA_HOME is set to C:\Program
> > Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_11. who put \jre on the end?)
> 
> maven did
> 
> when something goes wrong, i find maven is often cryptic. the only way i
> can debug a maven build is to run with debug on.

FWIW, Buildbot reports the same errors as Scott [1] and now fails since I
added the assembly:assembly step.

[1] - http://ci.apache.org/builders/rat_trunk/builds/48

Running it with --debug gives it this output :

http://ci.apache.org/builders/rat_trunk/builds/50/steps/compile/logs/stdio

Hopefully that will help.
Let me know please if Buildbot can do other tests for the project.

For now I will leave assembly:assembly and --debug turned on in Buildbot, so
any new commits to Rat project will see failure reports come to this list
until such a time as the problems are solved or you tell me to alter the
tests once more :)

Gav...

> 
> - robert


Reply via email to