On 8 July 2011 07:58, Robert Burrell Donkin <rdon...@apache.org> wrote: > On 07/07/11 22:04, Gavin McDonald wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:rdon...@apache.org] > >>> and about tooling for OpenOffice.org >> >> in what way? > > Comprehension tools are a necessity for OOo > >> (and why single out one project) > > OpenOffice is the first podling beyond the scale that's feasible for > manual review
+1 As a mentor I am not looking forward to trying to do the reviews necessary. Any tooling that can help the mentors has to be good. I don't think it's a case of singling out OO.o - it's more of a case of identifying an undeniable use case. Ross > > (The community don't see the value ATM in creating a finely grained > component architecture with a rational release flow integrating > continuous delivery across a wide platform spectrum...) > > Robert > -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
