On 04/27/2011 11:38 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 27/04/2011 10:21, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 27/04/2011 09:55, Sander van der Waal wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed the Rave website is not live yet so went through the pages and
made
a few tweaks and I think it's good enough to be live the way it is now
[1].
It still needs some CSS work page content is not well aligned with the
logo for example, colours need to change to match the logo).
The logo itself looks horrible, there is loads of aliasing introduced by
the scaling process.
-1 on going live with it in its current form.
Sander just popped in to check with me about my -1. To clarify, I'm only -1 on
the logo issue it's a shame to have such a great logo then hide it in a nasty
aliased scaled version.
I agree.
FYI: as you have seen I've also pinged Rolf to see if he can provide a good
scaled down version, but Rolf isn't available for at least the next several
hours. I took a shot at scaling it down myself but that really turned out to be
just as horrible (not my expertise anyway).
So either we'll wait on Rolf to come up with a proper version or someone else
who has the skills to do this takes a shot at it.
The CSS issues are only -0.
I'm +0 on this, but if someone has the cycles to fix/improve the css before the
end of the week, I'd prefer waiting on that, otherwise publish it once the logo
is fixed.
Ross
Most important thing missing is the wiki that has not been created yet.
Do I create an INFRA issue for that?
We never requested a wiki in the proposal. I think that was a copy and
paste from the template I used elsewhere, now removed.
Ross
Sander
[1] http://rave.staging.apache.org/rave/index.html
