On 16/05/2011 20:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
On 5/16/11 3:11 PM, "Scott Wilson"<[email protected]>  wrote:

On 16 May 2011, at 19:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:

I am still a little fuzzy on how this integration will work.  The code
Scott has makes a call to a widget service that pulls back the instance
of
the widget for the user.  I am assuming we are then going to use this
instance to construct an iFrame URL that points back to Wookie for
rendering.

What I was originally assuming was that the RegionWidget instance would
contain everything needed to create the URL for the iFrame and we
wouldn't
need to replace it with a separate call to a widget service.

Conceptually, there is a difference between what Wookie and Rave think of
as a Widget "instance".

In Wookie, a Widget Instance is both per-context (RegionWidget) AND
per-viewer. So the RegionWidget references a single Rave Widget; Wookie
has a collection of widget instances for each viewer of that Rave Widget.
Hence its not really possible to pass everything needed, unless the Rave
model was extended with a RegionViewerWidget (or somesuch).

Just to clarify terminology (possible difference between OpenSocial and
W3C:

An OWNER is the person who added the widget to the page and made any
          customizations

A VIEWER is the current person viewing the page and has read-only access
          (Unless the current viewer is the owner) To widget properties
          and preferences (not relevant until we have profiles)

So given those terms, every viewer of the widget has their own instance?

Not necessarily.

Each widget instance has a unique combination of an APIKey and a SharedDataKey. It's possible that multiple users will have the same keys.

Ross






Ross, since you are taking on this piece, can you point me at some docs
on
the connectors you are talking about?  I think I am missing some
fundamental step in the Wookie rendering process :)

-Matt

On 5/11/11 4:39 PM, "Ross Gardler"<[email protected]>  wrote:

On 11/05/2011 18:15, Scott Wilson wrote:

On 11 May 2011, at 17:28, Ross Gardler wrote:

Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)

On 11 May 2011, at 13:58, Scott
Wilson<[email protected]>
wrote:

On 11 May 2011, at 13:23, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:

I am assuming that this is a matter of creating a new rave-wookie
project,
similar to rave-shindig and adding the javascript to create the
widget
iFrame urls.  Is there anything I am missing?

For Wookie you need to request the Widget Instance corresponding to
the current viewer before passing the Widget model to the view, but
after that it should be about the same.

Wookie provides connectors to make this all much easier. I have a use
case for this feature. You can assume I'm going to take this issue
sometime in the next couple of weeks (happy for someone to beat me
off
course).


I've committed what I had, but with the actual "connector" bit
commented out in DefaultWidgetService - over to you, Ross!

Thanks Scott. Hope to get to this "soon"

Ross


Ross



-Matt

On 5/10/11 10:30 AM, "Matt Franklin (JIRA)"<[email protected]>
wrote:


  [


https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-30?page=com.atlassian.ji
ra
.plug
in.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Matt Franklin updated RAVE-30:
------------------------------

Fix Version/s: 0.1-INCUBATING

Render W3C widgets on Page in iFrames
-------------------------------------

              Key: RAVE-30
              URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-30
          Project: Rave
       Issue Type: Story
         Reporter: Matt Franklin
          Fix For: 0.1-INCUBATING


Enable the rendering of W3C widgets inline on the page via
iFrames

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira








Reply via email to