-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Duh, I used http instead of https in svn commands. Mystery solved.


Marlon


On 8/8/11 6:35 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marlon Pierce [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 5:30 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [discuss] non-default service implementations in svn
>>
> Looks like I don't have write permission to add the sandbox directory to rave
> (that is, can't create
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/sandbox):
> 
>> Hmm.  I was able to...  See if you can commit to that directory.
> 
> 
> 
> [->svn commit sandbox/ -m "(RAVE-161) Import sandbox"
> subversion/libsvn_client/commit.c:873: (apr_err=175002)
> svn: Commit failed (details follow):
> subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/util.c:296: (apr_err=175002)
> svn: MKACTIVITY of '/repos/asf/!svn/act/852c1c1e-05aa-0410-8ab8-
> e59c61b1489b': 403 Forbidden (http://svn.apache.org)
> 
> 
> 
> Marlon
> 
> 
> 
> On 8/5/11 8:51 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
>>>> On 08/04/2011 11:32 PM, Marlon Pierce wrote:
>>>> I like the sandbox idea--this would be rave/sandbox in SVN?
>>>>> Yup, just create it.
>>>>
>>>>> I like having an svn sandbox too, as Ross said it is common practice.
>>>>> You usually see then either user "owned" folders or feature specific
> folders, e.g. rave/sandbox/mpierce or rave/sandbox/xyzuserservice
>>>>
>>>>> So while I like sandboxes, I'm not sure if it would be good for your use-
> case, but I don't know enough about it.
>>>>
>>>>> The downside of using the sandbox is that it pretty much is off everyone's
> radar, so it will be less likely for you to get much support and attention 
> from
> the other team members as well as from the community. Keeping your
> feature "in line" with the current development will be more difficult, as 
> well as
> the other way around: considering possible breakage of your sandbox feature
> is more difficult for the others.
>>>>
>>>>> But using a sandbox is great to prototype/experiment with possible future
> use-cases while still providing everyone access/visibility.
>>>>
>>>>> Concerning your use-case, non-default service implementation in general:
> IMO this should be a core/intrinsic supported "feature" of Rave, and be easily
> doable with the least possible hassle (maybe even runtime).
>>>>
>>>>> For Jetspeed Portal this was a key "feature" as well (replaceable
> components/services through configuration *only*), whereas we several
> implementations live and maintained side-by-side within one component (for
> instance LDAP or DB security) and always deployed/packaged them together
> in one jar (Maven module) and used only Spring configuration (overlapping
> configurations) to enable/disable which implementation was used at runtime.
>>>>
>>>>> Alternatively, if the "service" contract can be abstracted away properly
> through interfaces only (preferably), then it should be possible to split each
> implementation off in its own implementation Maven module and let the
> deployment configuration pick which to bundle. Such separation would fit well
> with adding a rave-extensions (pom) module underneath than individual
> extension modules can be added.
>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, it all depends on your current use-case, and starting out in the
> sandbox might be good enough for now. But if it covers a general use-case I'd
> prefer it being integrated within the project itself at some time :)
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>>> Ate
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/4/11 5:29 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>>>>> On 4 August 2011 21:59, Franklin, Matthew B.<[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From: Marlon Pierce [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:17 PM
>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> Subject: [discuss] non-default service implementations in svn
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'd like to extend the DefaultUserService.java for some upcoming
> Rave-based
>>>>>>>>> projects.  Would there be objections to putting such things in the
> Apache
>>>>>>>>> SVN, under rave/trunk/rave-extensions, for example?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe not under trunk. But a different directory all together?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Pro: would provide examples for customizing and extending Rave,
> especially
>>>>>>>>> for those not familiar with Spring; would be applicable to a defined
> developer
>>>>>>>>> community (XSEDE Science Gateways) I'd like to attract to the project.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Con: "extensions" are a slippery slope, could become a mess of
> disjointed
>>>>>>>>> code fragments out of sync with the main code base.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think it depends on how complete the solution is.  If you are going 
>>>>>>>> to
> have an entire set of classes that override/extend default Rave
> implementations, but are all in support of the same purpose (science
> gateways), then I could see making the case that there is a science gateway
> extension.  Otherwise, it would just be example code, IMO.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A fairly common practice is to have a "sandbox" area in SVN. It's
>>>>>>> ideal to do work like this that may or may not be a good idea
>>>>>>> depending on how it progresses. If someone asks "how do I do foo" we
>>>>>>> can respond "one way would be like that in the sandbox, but we're not
>>>>>>> convinced it's the best approach, your help is welcome"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ross
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOQSK6AAoJEEfVXEODPFID7hcH/0DNHynU6nj4he+bfS8edI00
AMaP5+uNK/P8pIdfDLm/lq0CuFMyqUUpFmp9Qd9G8RLkVZ9qJO9nFCaJIWrXRziv
9FY2pvv9ObLg2129k0ZQtVi4vqLc09mzQLu0M1mMrci8JoiaBXSa0uNF2/n6xIEl
RY894eaNJ+PDcUDcZ4dk6huw4zUhxTS085uk7jvJnjdUS7ElHfKLe87Abt7CkJDG
F7GIsrI6a+1LMituiQ/PP72INphTE9jEj0v01sySsjhYGmJ+hH188Dd9v2WndGUU
jf+LCZS0+YfEMzfSXGTbAxOWkfOnWIGqyQHInFMz7RjwCmXNsa2L/BG8QR1UU+8=
=lBSL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to