>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ate Douma [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 8:27 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: Jira tickets and sandbox svn checkins
>
>On 08/17/2011 11:43 PM, Marlon Pierce wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Normally all of our SVN check-ins should be associated with Jira tasks.
>>   Should we continue this or suspend it for sandbox checkins?
>I would prefer we associate SVN check-ins as much as possible with JIRA
>issues,
>including for sandbox checkins.
>
>The thing with sandbox tasks/issues of course is: they are not related to the
>main/current development cycle/version, so setting a "fix for" etc. doesn't
>make
>much sense.

+1

>
>But it would be good to somehow make it clear such JIRA issues are related to
>sandbox development.
>
>One way would be to add a new "sandbox" JIRA component.
>Or maybe even better, add a "sandbox-science-gateway" JIRA component. I
>prefer
>then using a "sandbox-" prefix instead of "-sandbox" postfix to get all sandbox
>"components" to be logically grouped together.
>

+1 

>Concerning JIRA components in general, I think we can and should use them
>more.
>Right now there only "site" and "build & development" are defined, but
>adding a
>few sensible onces like "portal", "shindig","persistence", "security" etc. will
>help classify our issues better.
>And even more so when we start adding more rave-components sub
>modules.

+1.  I think every module should have a component

>
>Regards,
>
>Ate
>
>>
>>
>> Marlon
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
>> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>
>>
>iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOTDYZAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDywwH/0mNqwO0QIHrBQ5PVSP
>TMSnj
>>
>xzIbJWOLz/zAAhSgahuBELzDB1BrwmQ2ohdx046Pt83rAN0O50RZbh+jRFh2Lxv
>D
>>
>DKVLWMg2EAFgVRhxQ7NqlxcTctjzTVB+vGvYR7OEqGqXvYh3gwOXqO7DcHWE
>fEjw
>>
>eKGndQyw7/yDRWR2pRt1lBX4O/Qb6yiITVIBmmV1/s2fjkn09WbXs/zyFiqy1Pq
>5
>>
>SvNIleqx+KCmbiuTNOGhmFW2EKMft8k75LqTE1pFfuvINEoSTwAepfOjT7sCYt5
>b
>>
>vYdii4uW2+uZNElpe279CojwxHBkgF1Yaz0w10FnFWsaeWb+kSUHdZV+Xe1GC
>No=
>> =77tw
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to