[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13140262#comment-13140262
]
Jesse Ciancetta commented on RAVE-310:
--------------------------------------
I agree with Tony -- I think we do need owners for Widgets so we can support
federated development (people writing/registering their own Widgets).
I agree that many of the Widgets will be owned and managed by an administrator,
but I think its important to support a model where any user can author and
register a widget and have it in the unpublished state until an administrator
approves it. And I think the ownership is important so that the user who
authored/contributed the Widget can continue to manage the metadata for it
(change the title/description/spec URL/...) as needed.
I think if a user registers a common Widget that they don't actually own (like
from iGoogle for example) then I think an administrator could take ownership of
it going forward.
> Widget - ModelPermissionEvaluator and Service Annotations
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RAVE-310
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-310
> Project: Rave
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Anthony Carlucci
> Assignee: Anthony Carlucci
> Fix For: 0.5-INCUBATING
>
>
> Create a ModelPermissionEvaluator and Service Annotations for the Widget class
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
