On 22 Nov 2011, at 16:43, Jasha Joachimsthal wrote: > @Scott: that's the Java library, not the Javascript library which says it's > available as Public Domain
Ah OK. No, I wouldn't add a license header to it, but include the text already in the source: http://www.JSON.org/json2.js 2011-10-19 Public Domain. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. See http://www.JSON.org/js.html This code should be minified before deployment. See http://javascript.crockford.com/jsmin.html USE YOUR OWN COPY. IT IS EXTREMELY UNWISE TO LOAD CODE FROM SERVERS YOU DO NOT CONTROL. I'd also include an entry in NOTICE. > > On 22 November 2011 17:08, Scott Wilson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I undertsood json2.s to be licensed under the JSON license, which is OK >> for inclusion in Apache projects. >> >> See: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#json >> >> On 22 Nov 2011, at 14:15, Jasha Joachimsthal wrote: >> >>> During development I notice that the cdn we get json2.js [1] from is >>> relatively slow. The json2.js is "public domain". If we add this to the >>> project, should we add it without adding an Apache license header to it? >>> >>> [1] http://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/json2/20110223/json2.js >>> >>> Jasha Joachimsthal >>> >>> Europe - Amsterdam - Oosteinde 11, 1017 WT Amsterdam - +31(0)20 522 4466 >>> US - Boston - 1 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02142 - +1 877 414 4776 (toll >> free) >>> >>> www.onehippo.com >> >>
