Hi, On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 22:01 +0100, Martin Egger wrote: > > Good question. The answer lies between "never" and "always". A > > professional (for varies degrees of professional), would have many very > > similar photos. The amateur could end up having to WB-adjust every > > photo, imagine 100 vacation photos all taken at different locations. > > I don't think amateurs will use CWB very often at all. They probably shoot > either JPEG or use camera WB.
Maybe you're right. > > (But if the pro has to be really happy, he needs better paste - ability > > to paste to multiple photos in one command is a must.) > Yes, that's needed, but isn't this somewhere on bugzilla or the TODO-list > already? I wanted to include a bug#, but couldn't find it in bugzilla, but there it is, right in front of me in the TODO ;) > > We're trying to protect users from themselves, which I think is leading > > nowhere. Maybe it's just me, but I've never accidentally clicked on the > > image. Basically I don't like a toggle between: > > - Do what I want. > > - Don't do anything. > OK, two different opinions here. What about keeping the current implementation > as is and wait for 'real user' feedback once people start actually using the > program? It's okay to wait for user feedback, but we are painting ourself into a corner. It's getting harder to change the default behavior as the userbase grow. /abrander _______________________________________________ Rawstudio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev
