On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Brian Fahrlander wrote: > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:15:03 -0400 (EDT), Samuel Checker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've been testing Razor, invoked from sendmail/procmail and so far it > > seems pretty copacetic. Last night's spam to the list provided a good test > > - the spam itself as well as several of the responses were flagged, as > > other list members reported. > > > > Are you using Spamassassin on the input side? I've just changed my sendmail >installation and am looking for the 'proper' way to pass it through there, >systemwide, before accepting it and sending it to the users. It's kinda problematic >to set up procmail scripts for every user, when the user's home directories are NFS >mounted....and the source is on my own machine, on which I try new things. (And it's >the only machine with the drivespace...) >
I've not used Spamassassin on the KISS principle. I just have procmail adding an X-header and optionally modifying the Subject if razor-check comes back positive. -- sc ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
