While I can't give you any idea of a realistic threshold, I can tell you that my spam reporting output isn't all that high, either, and it didn't take very long before I noticed my submissions were being listed.
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, bnixon wrote: > Having switched to the new razor and getting it to work (not too bad) I > wonder when my reports will be taken seriously. The server I am using is > a test bed server so the amount of mail is small. Most of the spam I > have reported comes from my hotmail inbox and is defiantly unsolicited > spam. > > If shear volume is necessary then I'm afraid that razor will not work > for me. > > The ability for my clients to report spam and have the mail > administrator filter the mail and then send the true spam to razor is of > the utmost importance to our organization. You logic behind changing to > a score based system is in no way flawed it would just be nice to see my > reports actually have some effect. All mail domains have there own > versions of the variety of spam they receive and as we all know blocking > content it the only way to effectively stop it. > > > Brad Nixon > Senior network technician > Internet Xpress > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Razor-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users > -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog Pound II BBS telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
