Good evening, Jordan,

On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, William Stearns wrote:

> On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, Jordan Ritter wrote:
> 
> >     I have always respected people for being able to decode protocols,
> >     and I've done a few myself so I know how much work you put into
> >     that.  Good job!
> 
>       On the contrary - the code is reasonably well commented, and I 
> have access to it in the first place.  The first version, based solely on 
> an ethereal dump, only got about 40% of what you see now.
> 
> >     Just wanted to send you a side note on this though; we already
> >     have a whitepaper ps/pdf on the protocol spec, and we're just
> >     putting some final finishing touches on it now before we publish
> >     it, so I thought I'd warn you before you expend too much effort.
> 
>       Marvelous!  I knew you had the work underway, but thought a 
> temporary, if highly inaccurate, glossary might be instructive to those 
> that actually care about the protocol level.
>       My sincerest apologies for the unavoidable mistakes.
> 
> >     While the protocol itself is fairly simple, there are some subtle
> >     nuances that you won't likely catch yet and it might push people
> >     in the wrong direction if you don't understand them and document
> >     them wrong.  I don't want to discourage you at all, but again,
> 
>       I'm quite sure that is, in fact, the case, which is why I put so 
> many disclaimers on the announcement and the document itself.
> 
> >     we're releasing an official one soon so I wouldn't want to see you
> >     spend hours on this for nothing.
> 
>       I'm sincerely happy to hear that.  I plan to put pointers to your 
> version in very large letters at the top of that file.
>       As always, my sincerest thanks to all three of your for all your
> work on razor{1,2}.
> 
> > On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 05:06:25PM -0400, William Stearns wrote:
> > #   In the absence of a formal protocol description, I've written one 
> > # up for those that are interested.  It is not: complete, sanctioned, 
> > # verified, or official.
> > # 
> > # http://www.stearns.org/razor-caching-proxy/razor2-protocol

        Just a followup and nudge to see what the state of that document 
is.
        Please don't be too concerned about cleanliness; it can't be in 
worse shape than mine.  ;-)  I'd be sincerely interested in seeing it in 
any form, complete or not.
        Again, thanks for all your work on razor2.
        Cheers,
        - Bill

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
        "You have to stay in shape. My grandmother, she started walking
five miles a day when she was 60.  She's 97 today and we don't know
where the hell she is."
        -- Ellen DeGeneris
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
William Stearns ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).  Mason, Buildkernel, named2hosts, 
and ipfwadm2ipchains are at:                        http://www.stearns.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------------



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users

Reply via email to