On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 15:54, Jeffrey Taylor wrote:
> LOL. Another stupid, fucking, paranoid, anti-spam loser. Serves him
> right to be kept off the list.
I'm happy enough for him to use that sort of system to keep his incoming
mail spam free. However any system that manages to send what is
effectively a mail non-delivery notice to the list posting address (even
if there was a reply-to: header on list postings, which there is not in
the case of the razor-users list), is *seriously* broken and should be
removed from the internet immediately.
Folks, if you are going to build autoreply systems for mail then do it
right - people have already demonstrated all the possible cock-ups for
this sort of thing, no need to show us all of them again.
I would write the guy himself about this, but since he has raised the
bar to communication (by obscuring his email address and making me then
jump through a confirmation) hoop, he has persuaded me that I can't
can't be arsed to bother with him.
Nigel.
[Hoping the autoreply part of this thing is at least bright enough not
to start a real mail loop - but unfortunately thats all too likely]
--
[ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4729346;7592162;s?http://www.sun.com/javavote
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
