So if it doesn't care about addresses, how does a non-spammer end up listed in the database as a spammer?
I know that, before I decided to take the risk and install Razor, the reviews I'd read on the web said that the false positive situation was Razor's biggest drawback, and that the problem was due to how easy it is to add someone to the database and how difficult it is to revoke that. On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 15:58, Rose, Bobby wrote: > Razor doesn't care about addresses. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Hartwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 5:20 PM > To: Razor Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [Razor-users] Private mail being classified as spam > > > On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 08:17, Chris Mason wrote: > > I am using spamassasin and razor 2. One of my clients is sending me > > mail that ends up in the spambox. She is sending from a Mac using OSX. > > > As she is sending private mail from her to me, how does it get > > classified as spam by razor? > > > > Here's the headers. > > > > > > SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results > > ---------------------- > > SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been > > altered > > SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. > > SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. > > SPAM: > > SPAM: Content analysis details: (4.10 hits, 4 required) > > SPAM: USER_AGENT_APPLEMAIL (-1.8 points) X-Mailer header indicates a > > non-spam MUA (Apple Mail) > > SPAM: SMTPD_IN_RCVD (1.2 points) Received via SMTPD32 server > > (SMTPD32-n.n) > > SPAM: SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 (0.8 points) BODY: Spam phrases score is 00 > to > > 01 (low) > > SPAM: [score: 0] > > SPAM: RAZOR2_CHECK (3.9 points) Listed in Razor2, see > > http://razor.sf.net/ > > SPAM: > > SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results > > --------------------- > > Looking at the scores, it appears to me that the problem is that Razor2 > Check score. So the question is, why is her address listed in Razor2? If > not for that one category, she would not have been listed as spam, so it > may be worth your while to find the answer to that question. -- Bill Hartwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
