Whoops, I missed that. My bad. I did not realize logic method could be specified as a command line option, hence the -lm5 part completely went over my head. I assumed "LM 5.0" was some obscure milter or other tool that fox was using "with" razor :)

(smacks forehead repeatedly)


At 11:17 AM 1/22/2003 -0800, Jordan Ritter wrote:
Matt,

   I think Fox was saying that he was in fact using Logic Method 5 to
   begin with.

   Again Fox, even if limited to private mail, we'd like to understand
   the nature of the problem by learning one (or more) sets of the
   signatures in question.  We all of course doubt a hash collision is
   occurring, but that's just as speculative as saying there is a
   collision without any proof or understanding of what's happening
   (versus a bug in the Unix razor-agents software, which has been
   known to happen ;-) ).

--jordan


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users

Reply via email to