Vipul, > I am happy to announce that at Cloudmark we have decided to release one of > the newer signature algorithms in the next release of Razor Agents. Known > as "Whiplash", ...
Excellent. I'm sure we Razor users will appreciate it. At this stage in the Razor/SpamNet project, I wondered how valuable the Razor userbase is. Presumably its value comes from the spam submissions, which leads me to wonder what the comparitive volume, efficiency and latency of Razor compared to SpamNet. By "volume", I mean total number of submissions per unit time/signature (as appropriate); by "efficiency" I mean the proportion of submissions which achive a reasonable default threshold for spamishness; and by "latency" I mean the amount of time from the first submission of a given signature to the mean or median. I'd also be interested to know how the TeS ratings of Razor and SpamNet users compare, if there is a valid comparison which can be made. -Andrew- -- _______________________________________________________________________ | -Andrew J. Caines- Unix Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary | | safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 | ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: GNOME Foundation Hackers Unite! GUADEC: The world's #1 Open Source Desktop Event. GNOME Users and Developers European Conference, 28-30th June in Norway http://2004/guadec.org _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
