On Thursday 17 June 2004 03:32, Christopher Sharp wrote: > Figures to date indicate it's NOT a drop in detection rates, but > instead has all the hallmarks of someone having produced a spam package > that actually manages to avoid all SpamNet/Razor algorithms.
Razor does not have detection "algorithms" as such but relies on matching spam previously reported to razor by someone prior to your getting it. So if those reporting spam are less active, or if razor has network issues then spam gets thru. Don't know about SpamNet. -- _____________________________________ John Andersen
pgpB2SvbsIUGf.pgp
Description: signature