Jim Have you looked at the MIRROR setting.
Buddy From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jim McPherson Sent: Monday, March 2, 2020 4:34 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [RBASE-L] - R:Base & DFS? All, I’m considering taking our R:Base share and replicating it as part of a Microsoft DFS (Distributed File System). What this entails is the operating system handles replicating all data in the directory between two or more servers. If one of the replication partners goes offline, the other is there to provide the application and data and, in theory, the end users are none the wiser. When the offline partner comes back on line it synchronizes with the online partner(s). It’s a form of hardening or redundancy. My question: Do we know if R:Base supports this configuration and/or are there limitations (performance or otherwise) that would dictate against this type of deployment? Is there a best practices that I’m missing here? Thanks, Jim McPherson -- For group guidelines, visit http://www.rbase.com/support/usersgroup_guidelines.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBASE-L" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> . To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbase-l/003701d5f0da%245c2eded0%24148c9c70%24%40jjcalibrations.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbase-l/003701d5f0da%245c2eded0%24148c9c70%24%40jjcalibrations.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> . -- For group guidelines, visit http://www.rbase.com/support/usersgroup_guidelines.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBASE-L" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbase-l/002a01d5f21e%24c890c850%2459b258f0%24%40comcast.net.
