Karen and Jan,
The way I did it before was using variable lookup list boxes and worked well 
although sometime a little slow although switching to temporary tables solved 
that issue. I definitely need to look at drag and drop. Thanks for the info, 
much appreciated.
 
Javier,
 
Javier Valencia, PE
[email protected]
O: 913-829-0888
C: 913-915-3137
 
From: 'Karen Tellef' via RBASE-L [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 9:07 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [RBASE-L] - Using Variable Lookup List to move data between tables
 
Javier:
 
Have you looked at the "drag and drop"?  It's on the right-click properties of 
list views.  You enable it first, then do the EEPs.  I've done it once or 
twice, I'd have to look in my notes where I might've kept examples of how I did 
mine.  So I can't give you examples without looking.
 
Karen
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thu, Sep 24, 2020 10:31 pm
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Using Variable Lookup List to move data between tables
I have an application in which I have to display records from one table 
(driving_table) and when I click on a record it is moved to a Temporary second 
table (selected_records) and virtually removed from the driving table 
(driving_table does not display records already present in the selected_records 
table)  so it cannot be selected again. Likewise, when I click on a record on 
the selected _records table, it is removed from the selected_records table and 
the driving_table display that record again since it is no longer in the 
selected_records table and thus it is available for re-selection if needed. 
Hopefully this makes sense.
In the past I have used two Variable Lookup List boxes, the first with the 
driving_table data and the second with the selected_records data and use "on 
click" to move record back and forth. Once the desired records are selected I 
merge them into one combined record and store it in a separate table.
Is this still the preferred way to do this or is there a better approach? I 
actually would prefer using two grids but I have not tried this approach.
Any suggestions or simpler/easier approach that you might have will be 
appreciated.
 
Javier,
 
Javier Valencia, PE
[email protected]
O: 913-829-0888
C: 913-915-3137
 
-- 
For group guidelines, visit 
http://www.rbase.com/support/usersgroup_guidelines.php
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RBASE-L" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbase-l/!%26!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAO1ueGVb5zRMiwo7hebUe7jCgAAAEAAAAPBnw8jQiQpDqLRYG3Y2WcoBAAAAAA%3D%3D%40vtgonline.com.
-- 
For group guidelines, visit 
http://www.rbase.com/support/usersgroup_guidelines.php
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RBASE-L" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbase-l/1423684075.601871.1601042830293%40mail.yahoo.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbase-l/1423684075.601871.1601042830293%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
 .

-- 
For group guidelines, visit 
http://www.rbase.com/support/usersgroup_guidelines.php
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RBASE-L" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbase-l/!%26!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAO1ueGVb5zRMiwo7hebUe7jCgAAAEAAAAKI4izG6E6hEuwuaL4G8c9sBAAAAAA%3D%3D%40vtgonline.com.

Reply via email to