I'm probably not getting it. My understanding is that up to 3 records 
may have the same fileno, and you want the name info from one 
record. It's not the fileno that I was wondering about, but the name 
info.... do all the records have the same name information?

Ben Petersen


On 4 Feb 2003, at 13:45, Jim Van Dillen wrote:
> 
> I know I have the right records since the "fileno" prints out on the
> report itself.
> 
> -------Original Message-------
> 
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> Date: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 08:47:40
> To: RBASE-L Mailing List <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Extracting column values
> 
> Jim,
> 
> You can append "and limit = 1" to the end of the where clause of your
> select/print statement.
> 
> But, out of curiosity, how do you know you got the right one?
> 
> Ben Petersen
> 
> 
> On 4 Feb 2003, at 1:16, Jim Van Dillen wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I am trying to create a report which extracts column values from
> > non-unique records.
> > 
> > I need to extract name values for listing names in a report
> > searching for records by a fileno field which is non-unique (usually
> > never more than 3 records which could have the same fileno).
> > 
> > Using a print statement as follows:
> > 
> > Print <report> fileno = <colvalue>. The problem is that now if there
> > are two records under the same fileno, the report prints twice, once
> > for each name in a record under the same fileno instead one report
> > listing each name found.
> > 
> > We have tried statements like:
> > 
> > "Select into <var>, <tablename.colname> where fileno = <varfileno>"
> > but have still been having two (or more) reports print.
> > 
> > Any help would be appreciated. You may reply privately if you wish.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > JAMES L. VAN DILLEN
> > Attorney at Law
> > 1505 S. Big Bend Blvd.
> > St. Louis, MO. 63117
> > (314) 645-8008; Fax (314) 645-8016
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  <
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >
> > > > > > > 
> 
> 
> . 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to