I replied to it last night or this morning, but I didn't see it hit the list. I noticed minimized trace for the first time this week, but it isn't the case here.
One of my forms calls proceedures in a codelocked apx file. I have Debug trace in the file and debug is set to ON, But this is where it stops tracing.
Dan
At 07:44 AM 2/21/03 -0500, you wrote:
Hi Dan, I don't have much to add here except I've seen the minimized TRACE on Win98 for quite a while. But, I don't believe I've seen you respond to this suggestion by Al Berry. This is the kind of duh that catches me all the time.Dave Billing Tall Tree Business Solutions ----- Original Message ----- From: "Albert Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 8:42 PM Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Crashing > > Are you running codelocked files? If you are any line over 80 characters will break trace. > > Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >Hi, > >Ok, this is a cool new thing, adding trace way down the line to start it > >later... Great, that saves lots of time. However, something is still > >stopping it from tracing, I don't know yet what. Is there any known > >problems that cause trace to stop tracing? > >Dan > > > > > > > > > >At 12:23 AM 2/20/2003 +0000, you wrote: > >> > >>I guess I should have known to try the obvious but there is nothing in the > >>documentation _that I've seen_ to suggest that you could do anything other > >>than "TRACE Command.fle (in ...)" > >> > >>I suppose something like: DEBUG TRACE works as well? > >> > >>Thanks Ben. > >> > >>Regards, > >>Alastair. > >> > >> > >> > >>----- Original Message ----- > >>From: "Ben Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 2:20 PM > >>Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Crashing > >> > >> > >>> You don't have to start the app with trace... just place the word > >>> "trace" at the point that you want it to start. Sorry it didn't occur to > >>> me before :( > >>> > >>> Ben Petersen > >>> > >>> > >>> On 19 Feb 2003, at 21:46, Alastair Burr wrote: > >>> > >>> > I've not had a problem with TRACE not going "deep enough" but it might > >>> > be nice to be able to invoke TRACE at some point in a command file > >>> > rather than having to start with it. > >>> > > >>> > What I have done, sometimes, is put "Trace_Break" on a line where I > >>> > want TRACE to revert from running the file to single step mode but > >>> > this won't help Dan if TRACE never gets to the point in his file where > >>> > the problem occurs. "Trace_Break" just throws an error message and I > >>> > find it easier than trying to use the [F9] Add Break option when > >>> > running files within files and it can easily be remmed out or moved. > >>> > > >>> > Regards, > >>> > Alastair. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > ----- Original Message ----- > >>> > From: "Dan Champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> > To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 7:48 PM > >>> > Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Crashing > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > No, thats not it. I can make it exit abnormally by following a > >>> > > direct > >>> > route > >>> > > through the form, to another then closing them. If only I could run > >>> > > trace that deep I might find it. I am surprised not to hear any > >>> > > mention of why trace can't go that far. I have files set to 60 and > >>> > > trace just stops tracing at about the fourth form that gets opened. > >>> > > Then the program runs as though trace was never called. (very > >>> > > strange indeed) > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > At 02:41 PM 2/19/03 -0500, you wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > >The RBase files are not on a box that the disk has spooled down > >>> > > >(sleep because of disk inactivity) is it? > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >can be open for hours at a time, > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >----- Original Message ----- > >>> > > >From: "Dan Champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> > > >To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> > > >Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 2:14 PM > >>> > > >Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Crashing > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > Allister, > >>> > > > > The trouble you had, was it with the form not exiting > >>> > > > > normally? The > >>> > > >form > >>> > > > > I am having trouble with can be open for hours at a time, the > >>> > > > > when it comest time to close it, it does not return to the > >>> > > > > calling program, so Rbase dumps me at the prompt. > >>> > > > > I can try adding a pause before hand and see what it does. > >>> > > > > Thanks, > >>> > > > > Oh, also I will examine how many run/returns I have nesting and > >>> > > > > see > >>> > if it > >>> > > > > is possible to use quit to instead. > >>> > > > > Dan > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > At 06:45 PM 2/19/03 +0000, you wrote: > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >Dan > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > >I have had (still do have) problems with forms where I have > >>> > > > > >solved it > >>> > by > >>> > > > > >putting: > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >Pause for 2 > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > >immediately BEFORE calling the form. Intentionally there is no > >>> > message > >>> > > > > >because the screen doesn't need it so that nothing shows that > >>> > > > > >there > >>> > is a > >>> > > > > >delay and there is nothing to do to clear the message. > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > >Anything less than 2 seconds and the problem remains. > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > >It might be worth your giving it a try... > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > >Regards, > >>> > > > > >Alastair. > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >>> > > > > >From: "Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> > > > > >To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> > > > > >Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 5:57 AM > >>> > > > > >Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Crashing > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > enter using dispatch > >>> > > > > > > pause 2 using "test" > >>> > > > > > > return > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > Dan Champion > >>> > > > > P.O. Box 223 > >>> > > > > Grandville, MI. 49428-0223 > >>> > > > > www.championsolutions.net > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > Dan Champion > >>> > > P.O. Box 223 > >>> > > Grandville, MI. 49428-0223 > >>> > > www.championsolutions.net > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > -- > Albert Berry > Full Time Consultant to > PSD Solutions > 350 West Hubbard, Suite 210 > Chicago, IL 60610 > 312-828-9253 Ext. 32 > > > __________________________________________________________________ > The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp > > Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ >
Dan Champion P.O. Box 223 Grandville, MI. 49428-0223 www.championsolutions.net
