|
Have anyone's thoughts meandered (perhaps needlessly and w/o
justification) to the difference(s) between the use of an EXISTS-clause versus
an IN-clause in a SELECT-statement? This has begun to consume more of my
available (mental) clock-ticks the past few days. Now, understand, I'm
probably truly twisted as there is no task in my current work that requires me
to use either approach ; so, it's nothing more than insane curiosity, idle
minds/hands ...
Anyway, the reason I began to wonder is that when I've
used correlated EXISTS-clauses or correlated IN-clauses, unless I recall
mistakenly, the result-sets were equal.
Am I wrong or missing
something?
Umm, if you have time,
thanks,
Steve (infuriatingly
curious) in Memphis
|
- [RBASE-L] - Re: An SQL Q : EXISTS vs IN, Within A Correla... J. Stephen Wills
- [RBASE-L] - Re: An SQL Q : EXISTS vs IN, Within A Co... David M. Blocker
- [RBASE-L] - Re: An SQL Q : EXISTS vs IN, Within ... Emmitt Dove
- [RBASE-L] - Re: An SQL Q : EXISTS vs IN, Wit... David M. Blocker
- [RBASE-L] - Re: An SQL Q : EXISTS vs IN,... Emmitt Dove
- [RBASE-L] - Re: An SQL Q : EXISTS v... Atrix Wolfe
- [RBASE-L] - Re: An SQL Q : EXISTS v... Ben Petersen
- [RBASE-L] - Re: An SQL Q : EXISTS v... David M. Blocker
- [RBASE-L] - Re: An SQL Q : EXISTS vs IN, Within ACor... Alastair Burr

