Karen scooped me on this one and I missed it in her first email.
It was originally her idea.


At 10:21 AM 6/13/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>I like your fix better than mine, Bernie!
>
>David Blocker
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Bernie Corrigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 4:58 AM
>Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Difference in way 1.864 works
>
>
>> Karen -
>>
>>         Confirmed your results using some virtually identical code here
>with
>> +'s and &'s.  The problem first appeared in 1.862 and continues in 1.864
>and
>> 1.866.  1.851 executes the code correctly with either +'s or &'s.
>>
>>         A workaround is to substitute (IFNULL(colname, '.', colname)) for
>> the column which has the NULL's in it.  This sticks "." in as the first
>> character in the column position in the menu and everything else lines up
>as
>> it should.  Tried using ' ' instead of '.' in the IFNULL expression and
>this
>> had the effect of disappearing all of the information on the right side of
>> the menu line after the NULL was encountered.  You could probably use any
>> character you want here (other than " ") and this will get you the
>increased
>> functionality of 1.864 with slightly funky menus.
>>
>> Bernie
>>
>>
>> At 06:07 PM 6/12/2003 EDT, you wrote:
>> >
>> >Nope, replacing & with + doesn't make a difference.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Try using + instead of the &operator.  The rule for & is that it
>> >concatenates blanks leaving just one.  I'm surprised the code below ever
>> >worked at all.  Try
>> >
>> >    CHOOSE vAsk FROM #VALUES FOR ( +
>> >    LJS(CompanyName,25) + LJS(city,12) + LJS(State,4) ) +
>> >    FROM companies WHERE .....
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Isn't RBTI finished with releasing more patches of 6.5++?
>> >
>> >>I suggest that you post it to RDCC.
>> >
>> >
>> >Karen
>> >
>> ><HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=2 FAMILY="FIXED"
>FACE="Courier
>> New" LANG="0"><BR>
>> >Nope, replacing &amp; with + doesn't make a difference.<BR>
>> ><BR>
>> > </FONT><FONT  COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2
>> FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
>> ><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT:
>> 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Try using + instead of the
>> &amp;operator.&nbsp; The rule for &amp; is that it<BR>
>> >concatenates blanks leaving just one.&nbsp; I'm surprised the code below
>> ever<BR>
>> >worked at all.&nbsp; Try<BR>
>> ><BR>
>> >&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; CHOOSE vAsk FROM #VALUES FOR ( +<BR>
>> >&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; LJS(CompanyName,25) + LJS(city,12) + LJS(State,4) )
>+<BR>
>> >&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; FROM companies WHERE .....<BR>
>> ></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
>> ><BR>
>> ><BR>
>> ></FONT><FONT  COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2
>> FAMILY="FIXED" FACE="Courier New" LANG="0">Isn't RBTI finished with
>> releasing more patches of 6.5++?</FONT><FONT  COLOR="#000000"
>> style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial"
>> LANG="0"><BR>
>> ><BR>
>> >&gt;I suggest that you post it to RDCC.<BR>
>> ><BR>
>> ><BR>
>> ></FONT><FONT  COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2
>> FAMILY="FIXED" FACE="Courier New" LANG="0">Karen<BR>
>> ></FONT></HTML>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to