I use Pause for 2 all the time and even Pause for 3, I do see the time difference in each. If I remember right, I have even used pause for 1.
Jim
Alastair Burr wrote:
I don't think it still applies but I always thought that "pause for 3" was the minimum value for the wait.
There is nothing to indicate this in the doucumentation but give it a try just in case...
Regards,
Alastair.
----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: RBASE-L Mailing List <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 5:36 AM Subject: [RBASE-L] - Pause for n command
I have a strange problem with the 'Pause for n' command. In one file
I have five of them. Only three work as designed. The other two
(identical) just keep the prompt standing there refusing to
disappear unless the OK button is pressed. They all use the 'for 2'
option.
Help anyone?
Robert
