----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alastair Burr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 3:21 PM
Subject: [RBASE-L] - RE: UNLOAD Command in R:BASE (was Re: How do I get ridof a 
DBFTable??)

> Both methods are a little klutzy but they work and I can reconstruct my 
> databases very quickly. It would, however, be nicer if RBTI could find a way 
> to make it all automatic. Us "oldies" are aware of the way it works but new 
> users would probably wonder why their new database may not be complete.

  Good enough reason for you to keep taking your "vites" so you can be around 
to help out the newbies.... if you're in for a penny, you're in for a pound 
(sterling)...  ;-)

>
> Regards,
> Alastair.
>
> PS: I hope you took my double exclamation marks in my reply yesterday as 
> intended - I whizzed it off rather too quickly. They were meant to signify 
> surprise rather than a shout. Apologies if you (or anyone) was offended.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Lawrence Lustig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 7:06 PM
> Subject: [RBASE-L] - RE: UNLOAD Command in R:BASE (was Re: How do I get ridof 
> a DBFTable??)
>
>
>> The biggest enhancement(s) I would like to see in UNLOAD:
>>
>> 1. Transitive closure for PK/FK dependencies when unloading table 
>> structures.  I believe it's currently possible for a table with an FK into 
>> another table to be unloaded _before_ the table with the corresponding PK. 
>> Trying to load this structure will fail.  R:Base ought to ensure that the 
>> order of tables is reloadable.
>>
>> 2. Transitive closure for view dependencies when unloading views.  I believe 
>> it's currently possible for view B that depends on view A to be unloaded 
>> before view A is unloaded.  This can happen if you define A, then B, then 
>> drop A and redefine it.  Obviously, the resulting file will fail to create 
>> view B when it is run.
>>
>> 3. Currently, stored procedures are not unloaded in any way.  I'd like to 
>> see the SYS_PROCEDURES and the other table for procedures (the name escapes 
>> me at the moment) unloaded as well.
>>
>> --
>> Larry
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1240 - Release Date: 23/01/2008 
>> 17:47
>>
>>
>
>
> 


Reply via email to