Thanks, that may be part of my problem, and also using a legacy version. On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Castanaro, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John, > That number of records should not be an issue. Whenever I see a slowdown (or > perceive one) I do a pack index to see if the index pointers are broken for > some reason. Otherwise a reload many times catches a problem. > Also, look at how your indexes are listed. I have made some great > improvements in the past by experimenting with certain indexes, and using > multiple indexes. > Best, > Bob C > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Croson > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:07 PM > To: RBASE-L Mailing List > Subject: [RBASE-L] - Database Limits > > Hi All. Seems like a quiet day, and doing a bit of cleanup on this DB, > so thought I'd ask this question. > > Is there a maximum record / table count for RBase? I've got a 4 table > database that's getting quite slow. > > Table 1 = 57,800 Records > Table 2 = 169,500 Records > Table 3 = 57,200 Records > Table 4 = 56,800 Records > > The data files are on a 100mb LAN, in a windows share. > > TIA! > > John Croson > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://pcnorb.blogspot.com/ > http://pcnorb.homelinux.org/ > > >
-- John Croson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pcnorb.blogspot.com/ http://pcnorb.homelinux.org/
