Can you then try replacing your lineend characters with (char(13)) using
SRPL?

 

Emmitt Dove

Manager, DairyPak Business Systems

Evergreen Packaging, Inc.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

(203) 643-8022

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 10:17 AM
To: RBASE-L Mailing List
Subject: [RBASE-L] - RE: Note vs Varchar Db Memo vs DB Rich Edit

 

Emmitt

 

True but I was hoping to be able us make some text bold

or use colors.  If I use DB Memo on those you see all the

font code.....unless I am missing something there?

 

Thanks

Marc

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Emmitt Dove <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  

To: RBASE-L Mailing List <mailto:[email protected]>  

Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 8:58 AM

Subject: [RBASE-L] - RE: Note vs Varchar Db Memo vs DB Rich Edit

 

Marc,

 

VARCHAR will still work with DBMEMO fields.  You don't need the Rich Text.

 

Emmitt Dove

Manager, DairyPak Business Systems

Evergreen Packaging, Inc.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

(203) 643-8022

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 9:41 AM
To: RBASE-L Mailing List
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Note vs Varchar Db Memo vs DB Rich Edit

 

Hi

 

I have a note field for storing text and I use DB Memo's on my forms.

This works great the ^ Lineend gets expanded to blank lines when you 

are in the forms as expected.

 

Now, I need more room so I change the field from Note to Varchar

then changed the form to use DB Rich edit.  Now it seems that the

^ show up instead of blank lines when in the forms.

 

Am I missing something or am I mixing up the data type and Rich Edit?

 

Even if I use a DB Memo in the form to edit the Varchar text I still see ^^

instead of blank lines.

 

I have Allow Returns checked.  If I an in the Rich Edit and press Enter

it puts in blank likes as I want,  Those seem to stick but the old ^
Lineends

are not converted or expanded to blank lines so to speak.

 

 

Thanks

Marc

 

Reply via email to