I hope it's ... wait, yes, it is ... FR:iday.
Otherwise, I would lose a lot of sleep tonight worrying about the Y10K problem! That's pretty good, y'all. ;-) From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 2:53pm 14:53 To: RBASE-L Mailing List Subject: [RBASE-L] - RE: Large integer values in Rbase v8 I was concerned about that also for my AR. <g> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry ________________________________ From: Bill Downall Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:40:20 -0400 To: RBASE-L Mailing List<[email protected]> Subject: [RBASE-L] - RE: Large integer values in Rbase v8 On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Wills, Steve <[email protected]> wrote: The cool thing is that (CTXT(JDATE())) used in this way still sorts exactly like INTEGER and DATE values. Ahh, but be warned: this will lead to serious problems when we roll over to 5-digit years. the year 9999 will sort afterthe year 10000. It will be known as the Y10K problem. Bill
