It is a temporary table, so I do not usually use indexes on temporary
tables. 
 
I am just wondering why it is so slow to update a temporary table. It should
be fast.
 
Dan Goldberg
 
  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dennis
McGrath
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 12:33 PM
To: RBASE-L Mailing List
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: space in zipcode



Since it is a temporary table he can do just what Larry suggests, regardless
if STATICDB is on.

 

Dennis McGrath

 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of jan johansen
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 2:26 PM
To: RBASE-L Mailing List
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: space in zipcode

 

Caveat,

 

In reference to the ongoing discussion of QUALCOLS and STATICDB,

DROP indexname is not available if you are running with STATICDB ON.

 

Jan
 


 

-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrence Lustig <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] (RBASE-L Mailing List)
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:17:17 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: space in zipcode

<< 

Thanks Bob and Buddy. I did both of those you recommended and it sped it up
but still takes alot of time. It is a big(727,000 rows) temporary table.

>> 


 

If that field is indexed, or participates in a multi-column index, drop the
index before you issue the update, then recreate it afterwards.

--

Larry


 

 

Reply via email to